Palmer v. Norfolk Sheriff et al
James Dion Palmer |
Norfolk Sheriff, Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General |
2:2024cv00510 |
April 11, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
John C Coughenour |
Brian A Tsuchida |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 TRANSFERRED CASE opened in Eastern District of Virginia as case 1:24-cv-00746 on 5/6/2024. (MIH) |
Case has been electronically transferred to the USDC for the Eastern District of Virginia per #4 Order Transferring Case. CC: Plaintiff via USPS. (MIH) |
Filing 5 MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS filed by Plaintiff James Dion Palmer. (MIH) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Incorrect IFP Form, Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. An IFP Form has been enclosed for your convenience. Filer has until 5/15/2024 to correct IFP application CC: Plaintiff via USPS(MIH) Modified on 4/16/2024 Re-mailed Notice to Plaintiff via USPS with corrected Prisoner ID (MIH). |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff James Dion Palmer. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Exhibits to Proposed 1983 Complaint)(MIH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.