Amazon.com Inc et al v. Bakan et al
Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America Inc |
Muammer Bakan, Osman Cellik, Mustafa Cenan, Enes Ceylan, Serhat Dag, Ogun Dalka, Ayce Idil Dis, Aygul Durgun, Erdem Karaman, Levent Keskin, Mumtaz Kerem Nayman, Haci Ali Orcan, Mesut Ozcelik, Gulcihan Salli, Sahin Salli, Fatma Nurten Sanlier, Nihat Telli, Ceylan Ulku, Ramazan Ulku, Engin Ulutas, Yusef Unvermis, Selcuk Yalcin, Omer Turgut Yuce and Does 1-10 |
2:2024cv00616 |
May 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Marsha J Pechman |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Summonses Electronically Issued as to All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons, #16 Summons, #17 Summons, #18 Summons, #19 Summons, #20 Summons, #21 Summons, #22 Summons) (KS) |
Filing 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office. (KS) |
Judge Marsha J. Pechman added. (KS) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Amazon Counterfeit Enforcement Action ; filed by Plaintiffs Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, Epson America Inc, Seiko Epson Corporation. (Commerson, Scott) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Seiko Epson Corporation, Corporate Parent U.S. Epson, Inc. for Epson America Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Epson America Inc, Seiko Epson Corporation. (Commerson, Scott) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Amazon.com, Inc. for Amazon.com Services LLC. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC. (Commerson, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF against defendant(s) Muammer Bakan, Osman Cellik, Mustafa Cenan, Enes Ceylan, Serhat Dag, Ogun Dalka, Ayce Idil Dis, Does 1-10, Aygul Durgun, Erdem Karaman, Levent Keskin, Mumtaz Kerem Nayman, Haci Ali Orcan, Mesut Ozcelik, Gulcihan Salli, Sahin Salli, Fatma Nurten Sanlier, Nihat Telli, Ceylan Ulku, Ramazan Ulku, Engin Ulutas, Yusef Unvermis, Selcuk Yalcin, Omer Turgut Yuce (Receipt # AWAWDC-8455305) filed by Seiko Epson Corporation, Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, Epson America Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Trademark Certificates, #2 Exhibit B - Amazon Services Business Solutions Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Amazon Anti-Counterfeiting Policy, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120), #6 Summons for Muammer Bakan, #7 Summons for Osman Cellik, #8 Summons for Mustafa Cenan, #9 Summons for Enes Ceylan, #10 Summons for Serhat Dag, #11 Summons for Ogun Dalka, #12 Summons for Ayce Idil Dis, #13 Summons for Aygul Durgun, #14 Summons for Erdem Karaman, #15 Summons for Levent Keskin, #16 Summons for Mumtaz Kerem Nayman, #17 Summons for Haci Ali Orcan, #18 Summons for Mesut Ozcelik, #19 Summons for Gulcihan Salli, #20 Summons for Sahin Salli, #21 Summons for Fatma Nurten Sanlier, #22 Summons for Nihat Telli, #23 Summons for Ceylan Ulku, #24 Summons for Ramazan Ulku, #25 Summons for Engin Ulutas, #26 Summons for Yusef Unvermis, #27 Summons for Selcuk Yalcin, #28 Summons for Omer Turgut Yuce)(Commerson, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.