Reitz v. Harrell et al
Plaintiff: Robin Mark Reitz
Defendant: Jay Inslee, Dow Constantine and Bruce Harrell
Case Number: 2:2024cv00829
Filed: June 10, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2024 Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: The Court DECLINES to serve Plaintiff's #5 complaint and GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint curing the above-noted deficiencies within 30 days after the date this order is signed. If no amended complaint is filed within this time period or if Plaintiff files an amended complaint that fails to correct the deficiencies identified above, the Court may dismiss Plaintiff's claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) and/or 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk is DIRECTED to re-note Plaintiff's #6 motion to appoint counsel to 8/30/2024. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (KRA) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
June 28, 2024 Filing 8 LETTER filed by Robin Mark Reitz. (KRA)
June 28, 2024 Filing 7 LETTER filed by Robin Mark Reitz. (KRA)
June 12, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff Robin Mark Reitz. Noted by Clerk for 8/30/2024 7/3/2024. (KRA) Modified noting date on 7/30/2024 per #9 Minute Order (KRA).
June 12, 2024 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (IFP Granted) filed by Robin Mark Reitz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (KRA)
June 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The undersigned recommends review by the assigned District Judge under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e)(2)(B). Signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (KRA) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
June 11, 2024 Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (KS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
June 10, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge S. Kate Vaughan filed by Robin Mark Reitz. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 PROPOSED Application for Court-Appointed Counsel, #4 Exhibits) (KS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reitz v. Harrell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Inslee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dow Constantine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Harrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Mark Reitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?