Forsman v. Port of Seattle et al
Raymond A Forsman |
Delinas Whittaker, Stephanie Jones Stebbins, K Lyles and Port of Seattle |
2:2024cv01101 |
July 24, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Robert S Lasnik |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc: USCA, Plaintiff via USPS) (MJV) |
Filing 12 REFERRAL NOTICE FROM USCA re #10 Notice of Appeal. This matter is referred to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of forma pauperis status is appropriate where district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). If the district court elects to revoke in forma pauperis status, the district court is requested to notify this court and the parties of such determination within 21 days of the date of this referral. If the district court does not revoke in forma pauperis status, such status will continue automatically for this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). (RE) |
Filing 11 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER/USCA CASE NUMBER (24-5643) as to #10 Notice of Appeal, filed by Raymond A Forsman. (RE) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL to Ninth Circuit (24-5643) re #9 Order Dismissing Case, by Plaintiff Raymond A Forsman. IFP granted on 7/25/2024. (cc: USCA) (Attachments: #1 Representation Statement, #2 Motion and Affidavit for Permission to Proceed Informa Pauperis) (RE) Modified on 9/18/2024 to add CCA#. (RE) |
Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court is required to dismiss a complaint if the action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because the claims asserted are barred by the doctrine of res judicata, relief is unavailable and amendment would be futile. The case is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (MJV) |
Filing 8 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS by Plaintiff Raymond A Forsman. (MJV) |
Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Joint Status Report due by 8/30/2024. (cc: Plaintiff via US Mail) (VE) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jeremy W Culumber on behalf of Defendants K Lyles, Port of Seattle, Stephanie Jones Stebbins, Delinas Whittaker. (Culumber, Jeremy) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against defendant(s) K Lyles, Port of Seattle, Stephanie Jones Stebbins, Delinas Whittaker, filed by Raymond A Forsman. (IFP Granted) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits)(MJV) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court recommends the complaint be reviewed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) before issuance of summons. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (MJV)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (KS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Brian A Tsuchida filed by Raymond A Forsman. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Attachment, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit) (KS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.