Kaur v. Jaddou et al
Sukhbir Kaur |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Danielle Lehman, United States of America, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick Garland |
2:2024cv01119 |
July 24, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Grady J Leupold |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Merrick Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Danielle Lehman, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States of America. (MW) |
NOTICE TO FILER: ***Case Terminated-Incorrect Division*** Civil case number 3:24-cv-5596 has been terminated. The incorrect divisional office was selected by the filer upon case opening. This case has now been assigned a Seattle case number. All future filings shall bear the following case number and Judge assignment: 2:24-cv-1119-GJL. Before initiating a new case, please review the #Attorney Case Opening Guide (PDF) to determine the correct divisional jurisdiction. (MW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-8559051) Attorney Adam Boyd added to party Sukhbir Kaur(pty:pla) filed by Sukhbir Kaur. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Boyd, Adam) (Attachment 1 replaced due to malformed pdf on 7/25/2024) (MW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.