Parr v. United States of America et al
| Victoria A Parr |
| United States of America, Ricardo Martinez, Richard Troberman, Jean Harstein and Hillary Rodham Clinton |
| 2:2025cv00538 |
| March 26, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Lauren King |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 38 STRICKEN per Dkt. 24 Minute Order LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr. (KRA) |
| Filing 37 STRICKEN per Dkt. 24 Minute Order LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr (Attachments: #1 Additional Letters) (KRA) |
| Filing 36 STRICKEN per Dkt. 24 Minute Order LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (KRA) |
| Filing 35 STRICKEN per Dkt. 24 Minute Order LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr. (KRA) |
| Filing 34 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) Modified on 8/21/2025 (APH). |
| Filing 33 STRICKEN REQUEST by Plaintiff Victoria A Parr for Payment and to Dismiss Judge (LH) Modified as stricken per 24 Minute Order on 8/12/2025 (LH). |
| Filing 32 STRICKEN LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr (LH) Modified as stricken per 24 Minute Order on 8/12/2025 (LH). |
| Filing 30 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) Modified on 8/8/2025 (APH). |
| Filing 31 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) Modified on 8/8/2025 (APH). |
| Filing 29 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Letter, #3 Letter) (APH) Modified to strike on 7/23/2025 (APH). |
| Filing 28 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) |
| Filing 27 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) |
| Filing 26 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr (APH) |
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER (text only) STRIKING #17 - #23 Ms. Parr's letters filed after the Court dismissed her case and entered judgment against her. Even liberally construing the letters as a request that the Court reconsider its order dismissing the case, the letters are substantively non-responsive to the Court's order and do not provide a basis for the Court to reconsider its order or re-open this case. Going forward, all procedurally improper filings will be summarily stricken. Ms. Parr is also cautioned that there are potentially serious consequences for pretending to be a judge. See 18 U.S.C. 912 (false personation). Authorized by Judge Lauren King. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (NAW)
|
| Filing 25 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER from Victoria A Parr filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) |
| Filing 23 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr (LH) Modified on 6/20/2025 (NAW). |
| Filing 22 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER from Victoria A Parr. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (APH) Modified on 6/20/2025 (NAW). |
| Filing 21 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr (LH) Modified on 6/20/2025 (NAW). |
| Filing 20 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr (LH) Modified on 6/20/2025 (NAW). |
| Filing 19 STICKEN per docket number 24 SEALED LETTER by Plaintiff Victoria A Parr (LH) Modified to add reason for sealing - sealed pursuant to LCR 5.2 on 6/5/2025 (LH). Modified on 6/20/2025 (NAW). |
| Filing 18 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER from Victoria A Parr re #4 Order to Show Cause, filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) Modified on 6/20/2025 (NAW). |
| Filing 17 STRICKEN per docket number 24 LETTER from Victoria A Parr. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(TE) Modified on 6/20/2025. (NAW) |
| Filing 16 JUDGMENT BY COURT. For the reasons stated in the Court's order dismissing the case, Dkt. No. #15 , judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of the Defendants. (APH) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court finds that Ms. Parr's proposed complaint, even liberally construed, is frivolous within the meaning of Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Ms. Parr's proposed complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend and her IFP application is DENIED. Dkt. Nos. #1 , #1 -1. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (APH) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 14 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) |
| Filing 13 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (APH) |
| Filing 12 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (APH) |
| Filing 11 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) |
| Filing 10 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) |
| Filing 9 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) |
| Filing 8 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr re #4 Order to Show Cause. (APH) |
| Filing 7 LETTERS filed by Victoria A Parr. (Attachments: #1 Copies of Letters) (APH) |
| Filing 6 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr re #4 Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment, #3 Copy of Letter) (APH) |
| Filing 5 LETTER filed by Victoria A Parr. (APH) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause by 04/29/2025, why the Court should not recommend her IFP application be denied. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (APH) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: plaintiff via USPS) (RE) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Brian A Tsuchida filed by Victoria A Parr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
