Tay Ramirez et al v. Hermosillo et al
| Marcelo Tay Ramirez, Juan Ramirez Martinez, Manuel Luchi Palacios, Juan Gongora Pech, Cesar Chavarria Vazquez, Cesar Chavarria Lopez and Ramiro Lopez Santiago |
| Laura Hermosillo, United States Department of Homeland Security, Executive Office for Immigration Review and Bruce Scott |
| 2:2026cv00527 |
| February 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tiffany M Cartwright |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT BY COURT. The Petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED with the relief ordered at Dkt. #10 . (MW) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Within ONE day of this Order, Respondents must either release Petitioner Cesar Chavarria Vazquez or allow his release upon payment of the alternative bond amount of $10,000 and any conditions set by Immigration and Customs Enforcement/the Department of Homeland Security. Within ONE day of this Order, Respondents must either release Petitioner Cesar Chavarria Lopez or allow his release upon payment of the alternative bond amount of $15,000 and any conditions set by Immigration and Customs Enforcement/the Department of Homeland Security. Within fourteen days of receiving Petitioner Marcelo Tay Ramirez's request for a bond hearing, Respondents must either release him or provide him a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). Within fourteen days of receiving Petitioner Juan Ramirez Martinez's request for a bond hearing, Respondents must either release him or provide him a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). Within fourteen days of receiving Petitioner Manuel Luchi Palacios's request for a bond hearing, Respondents must either release him or provide him a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). Within fourteen days of receiving Petitioner Juan Gongora Pech's request for a bond hearing, Respondents must either release him or provide him a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). Within fourteen days of receiving Petitioner Ramiro Lopez Santiago's request for a bond hearing, Respondents must either release him or provide him a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). Signed by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(MW)
|
| Filing 9 REPLY, filed by Petitioners Cesar Chavarria Lopez, Cesar Chavarria Vazquez, Juan Gongora Pech, Ramiro Lopez Santiago, Manuel Luchi Palacios, Juan Ramirez Martinez, Marcelo Tay Ramirez, TO RESPONSE to #8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Respondents Executive Office for Immigration Review, Laura Hermosillo, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Ng, Amanda) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Respondents Executive Office for Immigration Review, Laura Hermosillo, United States Department of Homeland Security. Noting Date 2/18/2026, (Lambert, Michelle) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michelle R. Lambert on behalf of Respondents Executive Office for Immigration Review, Laura Hermosillo, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Lambert, Michelle) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER (text only): The unopposed motion for expedited briefing schedule #3 is GRANTED. Respondents shall file a return to the habeas petition no later than February 17, 2026. Any traverse by Petitioners shall be filed no later than February 18, 2026. The Clerk shall note the matter for February 18, 2026. Authorized by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright. (BKP)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED (cc: Immigration Habeas Service) Responses due by 2/27/2026, Replies due by 3/4/2026, by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright. (RE)
|
| District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright added. (RE) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Aaron Korthuis re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioners Cesar Chavarria Lopez, Cesar Chavarria Vazquez, Juan Gongora Pech, Ramiro Lopez Santiago, Manuel Luchi Palacios, Juan Ramirez Martinez, Marcelo Tay Ramirez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)(Korthuis, Aaron) Modified on 2/13/2026 to regenerate NEF to AUSA. (RE). |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION to Expedite , filed by Petitioners Cesar Chavarria Lopez, Cesar Chavarria Vazquez, Juan Gongora Pech, Ramiro Lopez Santiago, Manuel Luchi Palacios, Juan Ramirez Martinez, Marcelo Tay Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 2/12/2026, (Korthuis, Aaron) Modified on 2/13/2026 to regenerate NEF to AUSA. (RE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 3:25-cv-05240, by Petitioners Cesar Chavarria Lopez, Cesar Chavarria Vazquez, Juan Gongora Pech, Ramiro Lopez Santiago, Manuel Luchi Palacios, Juan Ramirez Martinez, Marcelo Tay Ramirez. (Korthuis, Aaron) Modified on 2/13/2026 to regenerate NEF to AUSA. (RE) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-9473314) filed by Cesar Chavarria Vazquez, Juan Ramirez Martinez, Marcelo Tay Ramirez, Ramiro Lopez Santiago, Juan Gongora Pech, Manuel Luchi Palacios, Cesar Chavarria Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Korthuis, Aaron) Modified on 2/13/2026 to regenerate NEF to AUSA and Immigration Habeas Service. (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
