James v. Eaton et al
| Henry James |
| Michael T Eaton, Seattle Police Department Headquarters and City of Seattle |
| 2:2026cv00535 |
| February 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Richard A Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Henry James. Noting Date 4/1/2026. (KRA) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Serve Summons by the U.S. Marshals, filed by Plaintiff Henry James. Noting Date 3/30/2026. (APH) |
| Filing 6 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (cc: Plaintiff via US Mail) (VE) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) City of Seattle, Michael T Eaton, Seattle Police Department Headquarters with JURY DEMAND filed by Henry James. (APH) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court recommends the complaint be reviewed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) before issuance of summons. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (APH) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. cc Plaintiff via USPS (HH) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Michelle L. Peterson filed by Henry James. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (HH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
