Chang v. United States Department of State et al
| Tianyi Chang |
| United States Department of State, United States Embassy Beijing China, United States Consulate General Shenyang China, Marco Rubio and David Perdue |
| 2:2026cv02321 |
| July 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Kymberly K Evanson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. cc: Plaintiff via US Mail (LRS) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) David Perdue, Marco Rubio, United States Consulate General Shenyang China, United States Department of State, United States Embassy Beijing China, tendered in hard copy at Clerk's window, Seattle (LRS) Modified on 7/2/2026 to note hard copy distribution (LRS). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) David Perdue, Marco Rubio, United States Consulate General Shenyang China, United States Department of State, United States Embassy Beijing China (Receipt # 200010468) filed by Tianyi Chang. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Declaration of Tianyi Chang, #3 Notice of Intent, #4 Proposed Summonses, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(LRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
