Becker et al v. Homesite Insurance Company
| Travis Becker and Michelle Cottle |
| Homesite Insurance Company |
| 2:2026cv02521 |
| July 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CORPORATE AND DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent American Family Insurance Mutual Holding Company, Corporate Parent AmFam Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent AMFAM, Inc., Corporate Parent American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I., Corporate Parent Homesite Underwriting Managers, LLC, Corporate Parent Homesite Group, Inc. for Homesite Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1) and (2). Filed by Homesite Insurance Company. (Donohue, Alfred) |
| Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Homesite Insurance Company (Donohue, Alfred) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Alfred E. Donohue re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Homesite Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Donohue, Alfred) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Island County Superior Court, case number 26-2-00322-15; (Receipt # AWAWDC-9833703) filed by Homesite Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Donohue, Alfred) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
