Brhane v. Scott
Defendant: Bruce Scott
Petitioner: Natinal Brhane
Case Number: 2:2026cv02621
Filed: July 24, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: David G Estudillo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2026 Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (ZMG) (cc Petitioner via USPS)
July 24, 2026 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Natinal Brhane. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Habeas Petition, #2 Proposed Motion for Counsel) (ZMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brhane v. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Natinal Brhane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Scott
Represented By: US Attorney Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?