Collins v. Nadella et al
| Terrance Collins |
| Satya Nadella, Sandra E. Peterson, Carmine Di Sibio, Hugh F. Johnston, Teri L. List, Mark A.L. Mason, John David Rainey, John W. Stanton, Catherine MacGregor, Charles W. Scharf, Emma M. Walmsley, Penny S. Pritzker, Reid G. Hoffman, Amy E. Hood, Jared Spataro, Rajesh Jha and Microsoft Corporation |
| 2:2026cv03059 |
| August 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:26-cv-03058 and 2:26-cv-02281-BJR, by Defendant Teri L. List. (Maguire, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:26-cv-03058, by Defendant Teri L. List. (Maguire, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Filing Notice of Notice of Removal in State Court by Defendant Teri L. List (Maguire, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court JURY DEMAND by Plaintiff indicated in Complaint; from King County Superior Court, case number 26-2-27839-3-SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-9937662) Attorney Robert J Maguire added to party Teri L. List(pty:dft) filed by Teri L. List. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Verification of State Court Records and Declaration of Robert Maguire in Support)(Maguire, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.