Rahim v. Hernandez et al
| Abdulhaq Rahim |
| Julio Hernandez, Bruce Scott, MarkWayne Mullin, Todd Blanche and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 2:2026cv03476 |
| September 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Lauren King |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED (cc: Immigration Habeas Service) Responses due by 10/1/2026, Replies due by 10/6/2026, by Judge Lauren King. (LRS)
|
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Counsel Peyton Jacobsen re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Abdulhaq Rahim (Jacobsen, Peyton) Modified on 9/17/2026 NEF regenerated to AUSA (LRS). |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Abdulhaq Rahim re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Abdulhaq Rahim (Jacobsen, Peyton) Modified on 9/17/2026 NEF regenerated to AUSA (LRS). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-9989685) filed by Abdulhaq Rahim. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jacobsen, Peyton) Modified on 9/17/2026 NEF regenerated to AUSA and to Habeas Immigration Service (LRS). |
| Judge Lauren King added. (LRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.