Navarro Gavalo v. Scott et al
| Oscar Enrique Navarro Gavalo |
| Bruce Scott, Drew Bostock, David Venturella, MarkWayne Mullin and Todd Blanche |
| 2:2026cv03486 |
| September 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Kymberly K Evanson |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying Petitioner's #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (APH) (cc: petitioner via USPS)
|
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED (PRO SE PETITIONER) (cc: Immigration Habeas Service) Responses due by 10/1/2026, Replies due by 10/15/2026, by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Petitioner Oscar Enrique Navarro Gavalo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/17/2026. (MW) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # TAC 3-1443) filed by Oscar Enrique Navarro Gavalo. (MW) (cc: AUSA, Immigration Habeas Service) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
