Nielsen v. Miller-Stout
Petitioner: Kory Nielsen
Respondent: Maggie Miller-Stout
Case Number: 3:2007cv05192
Filed: April 20, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: J. Kelley Arnold
Presiding Judge: Franklin D. Burgess
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re denial of 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kory Nielsen.Noting Date 5/25/2007. by Judge J. Kelley Arnold. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(CMG, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nielsen v. Miller-Stout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Maggie Miller-Stout
Represented By: John Joseph Samson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kory Nielsen
Represented By: Sheryl Gordon McCloud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?