Murray v. Newman et al
| Mark T Murray |
| Kraig Newman and Megan Valentine |
| 3:2007cv05215 |
| May 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Grays Harbor |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| Karen L Strombom |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
JUDGMENT BY COURT in favor of Brad Johansson, Brian Rydman, Polly Davin against Mark T Murray (JLP)(copy mailed to plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 87 GRANTING 76 Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSING this matter WITH PREJUDICE as to all defendants, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 7/13/2009 (DN). A copy of this Order was mailed to plaintiff by regular mail.
|
|
Filing
87
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 76 MOTION for Summary Judgment Re Claims Asserted in Third Addendum to Complaint filed by Brad Johansson, Brian Rydman, Polly Davin. Noting Date 7/10/2009, by Judge Karen L Strombom. (JLP) (copy mailed to Plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 4 Complaint filed by Mark T Murray. Show Cause Response due by 6/15/2007.Signed by Judge Karen L Strombom. (PL, )
|
|
Filing
5
**DISREGARD -DOCKETED IN WRONG CASE** ORDER that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why this 4 Complaint should not be dismissed. A response is due by 6/15/2007. by Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG, ) Modified on 5/16/2007 (PL, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
