Ammons v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services et al
Crystal Ammons |
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Norm Webster and Mary LaFond |
3:2008cv05548 |
September 12, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Thurston |
Ronald B. Leighton |
Defendant |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 150 ORDER Denying Oral Motion of Reconsideration re Ramon Expert Testimony re 149 Order on Motion in Limine, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) |
Filing 124 ORDER GRANTING 107 Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Evidence or Argument Re: Fault of Child Victim of Sexual Abuse; GRANTING 110 Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Evidence; and DENYING 115 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defense No. 3. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) |
Filing 67 ORDER denying Motion(s) for Summary Judgment 33 40 by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(JAB) |
Filing 32 ORDER granting Defendants' Motion to allow additional deposition 26 . Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(CMG) |
Filing 24 ORDER on STIPULATION re 23 Issuance of Subpoena to Take the Deposition of Federal Employee Mary C. Rutherford, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting 13 Motion for FRCP 35 Examination, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) |
Filing 12 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 11 , signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.