Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Epstein et al
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans |
Linnea Billdt Epstein, Tamra Billdt Johnson, Brian John Billdt, Mark Andrew Stuen, Molly Janette Olbertz, Paul Frederick Stuen and Margot Elizabeth Johnson |
3:2008cv05671 |
November 6, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Insurance Office |
Pierce |
Benjamin H Settle |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER granting 48 Motion for Attorney Fees: plaintiff be awarded reasonable attorney fees of $26,142.50 and costs of $614.40, which sums shall be paid out of the funds deposited into the registry of the court. The Clerk is directed to is sue a check payable to Thrivent Financial for Lutherans in the total sum of $26,756.90 and to mail that check to the attention of Linda B. Clapham, Gordon & Rees, Attorney at Law, 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2130, Seattle, WA 98104. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to financial) |
Filing 45 ORDER denying 43 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing the moving defendants counterclaim; and the Plaintiff's request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs is hereby granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.