Knight v. Walmart Stores Inc

Knight v. Walmart Stores Inc

Plaintiff:	Terry L Knight
Defendant:	Walmart Stores Inc
Case Number:	3:2008cv05746
Filed:	December 15, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office:	Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County:	Mason
Presiding Judge:	Robert J. Bryan
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 21, 2009	Filing 71 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, finding as moot 65 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 66 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 68 Motion for Extension of Time; finding as moot 22 Motion to Dismiss; granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan.(JL)
November 25, 2009	Filing 54 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES AND RENOTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE UNTIMELY JURY DEMAND, by Judge Robert J. Bryan. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Untimely Jury Deman d and for Setting of Bench Trial (Dkt. 22) is RENOTED for December 3, 2009; Dfts Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 24) is RENOTED for December 3, 2009; Dfts Reply, if any, addressing the merits of Pltfs Response is SHALL BE FILED by December 2, 2009; Pltfs Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 32) STRICKEN AS MOOT; Pltfs Amended Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 39) will be GRANTED; Dft is GRANTED sanctions of $250. (DK)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 21, 2009

Filing 71 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, finding as moot 65 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 66 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 68 Motion for Extension of Time; finding as moot 22 Motion to Dismiss; granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan.(JL)

November 25, 2009

Filing 54 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES AND RENOTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE UNTIMELY JURY DEMAND, by Judge Robert J. Bryan. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Untimely Jury Deman d and for Setting of Bench Trial (Dkt. 22) is RENOTED for December 3, 2009; Dfts Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 24) is RENOTED for December 3, 2009; Dfts Reply, if any, addressing the merits of Pltfs Response is SHALL BE FILED by December 2, 2009; Pltfs Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 32) STRICKEN AS MOOT; Pltfs Amended Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 39) will be GRANTED; Dft is GRANTED sanctions of $250. (DK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knight v. Walmart Stores Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry L Knight
Represented By:	Jeffrey D Stier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Stores Inc
Represented By:	Rudy Albert Englund
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?