Morrison v. The Kroger Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Eddie Jim Morrison
Defendant: The Kroger Company, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv05183
Filed: April 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Pierce
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H Settle
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle denying 30 Motion for Reconsideration.(TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
March 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. (TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morrison v. The Kroger Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eddie Jim Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kroger Company, Inc.
Represented By: Susan Kathleen Stahlfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?