Bailon et al v. Seok AM #1 Corp et al
| Atanacio Bailon, Miguel A Esquivel, Pablo Esquivel, E Ismael Guido, Jose M Morales and Adan Nieves |
| Seok AM #1 Corp, Seok AM Corp, Sung Ki Min and Jane Doe Min |
| 3:2009cv05483 |
| August 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Pierce |
| J Richard Creatura |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 28 Stipulated Motion re 30 Exhibit, 29 Stipulated MOTION SCHMITT DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATED MOTION RE DISMISSAL Defendant Seok AM#1 dismissed with prejudice. Court retains jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreement but otherwise will be administratively closed, by Judge J Richard Creatura.(SC)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 24 Stipulated Motion to Continue Trial and Pretrial Deadlines. If a stipulated dismissal is not received sooner, the parties shall file a Status Report with the court by 6/14/2010, by Judge J Richard Creatura.(SC)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 10 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Protective Order by Judge J Richard Creatura.(SC)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER TO CLARIFY THE RECORD AND RENOTE 10 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims, to Strike Insufficient Defenses, and for Protective Order re: Immigration Status Discovery ; Noting Date 12/4/2009, by Judge J Richard Creatura. (SC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
