McCall et al v. Intercity Transit et al
| Michael McCall and Arthur West |
| Intercity Transit, Eve Johnson, Martin Thies, Joe Baker, Mary Dean, Tom Green, Ed Hildreth, Karen Rogers, Sandra Romero, Tom Bjorgen and Bjorgen Bauer Bjorgen, PLLC |
| 3:2010cv05564 |
| August 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Thurston |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Show Cause Response due by 7/22/2011, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 7/7/2011 (DN). (Copy mailed to Plaintiff McCall.)
|
|
Filing
42
AMENDED ORDER re 40 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 6/16/2011 (DN). (Copy mailed to plaintiff.)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting 27 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing this matter with prejudice, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER denying 29 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 3/3/2011 (DN). (Copy mailed to plaintiff.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying 7 Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, for Disclosure of Public Records, and for Remand. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 11/30/2010 (DN). (Copy mailed to plaintiff.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
