Evanston Insurance Company v. CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON et al
| Evanston Insurance Company |
| CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON, Wexford Health Sources, Inc, Phi Thi Nguyen, Gary E Lucas, Joseph K Dunegan, Jackie Batties, Bill Barron, Jack G. Huff, Michael J. Nagy, Robert Karcher, Daniel L Conn, Nickolas A. Little, Carol L. Rance, Kelly E. Epperson, Gladys C. Maynard, Reginald D Lewis, Daniel J. Gorecki, Rita A. Laurent and Susan M. Bankston |
| 3:2010cv05625 |
| September 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Clark |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER granting 94 Defendant Clark County's Motion to Compel plaintiff's payment of the award provided by the settlement agreement, and awards attorneys' fees to defendant for the costs of this motion, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER re 47 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Evanston Insurance Company. The Court requests that the City respond to the Motion within 5 days of this Order and at no more than 5 pages. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 43 Clark County's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
