Bergman v. Stigall
Plaintiff: Jerry Bergman
Defendant: Debra A. Stigall
Case Number: 3:2011cv05022
Filed: January 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Grays Harbor
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT BY COURT. (MET) cc: plaintiff
March 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 3/3/2011 (DN). (Copy mailed to plaintiff.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bergman v. Stigall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Bergman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Debra A. Stigall
Represented By: Patricia Campbell Fetterly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?