Foster Parents Association of Washington State v. Dreyfus et al
| Foster Parents Association of Washington State |
| Susan N. Dreyfus and Denise R. Robinson |
| 3:2011cv05051 |
| January 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Thurston |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 235
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 224 Motion to Approve Settlement by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(TG)
|
|
Filing 206
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting 180 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 186 Motion for Summary Judgment.(TG)
|
|
Filing 102
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle granting 98 Motion for Contingency Plan.(TG)
|
|
Filing 94
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 80 Motion for Protective Order.(TG)
|
| Filing 93 RESPONSE by Judge Benjamin H Settle to 74 MOTION for Clarification filed by Denise R. Robinson, Susan N. Dreyfus. (TG) |
|
Filing 72
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle denying 71 Motion for Reconsideration.(TG)
|
|
Filing 70
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle denying 45 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.(TG)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
