Gilligan et al v. Kanive et al
| Edward Paul Gilligan, Steven Lynn Brooks, Derek James Staton and Thomas Randel Hargrove |
| Roberta F. Kanive, Timothy Panek, G Steven Hammond and Dept of Corrections |
| 3:2011cv05061 |
| January 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Thurston |
| J Richard Creatura |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting 30 Report and Recommendations re 27 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Thomas Randel Hargrove, signed by Judge Benjamin H Settle.(MET) cc: Thomas Randel Hargrove
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle ADOPTING IN PART AND DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 24 Report and Recommendations. (TG; cc mailed to plaintiffs)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration/Objections signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(MET) cc: Plaintiffs
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 12 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 13 Motion to Compel and granting 15 Motion to Amend signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. The new scheduling order is as follows: Discovery completed by 8/12/2011, Dispositive motions due by 9/9/2011, Joint Status Report due by 1/14/2012. (MET) cc: Plaintiffs
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Denying 8 Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand to State Court signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(MET) cc: plaintiffs
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
