Smith v. Amaru, et al
| Scott C. Smith |
| Doug Waddington, Russell Amaru and Eric Hernandez |
| 3:2011cv05080 |
| January 27, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Mason |
| Robert J. Bryan |
| Karen L Strombom |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCOVER AND POSSESS WITNESS ADDRESSES, by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (cc: Pltf)(DK)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV P. 56(F), re 102 Objections to Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) Paper copy sent to plaintiff @ Walla Walla address . Modified on 10/15/2012 (JL).
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 83 Report and Recommendation. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 71 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER denying 75 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 79 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Russell Amaru, Eric Hernandez, Doug Waddington. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 49 ) and Request for Finding of Frivolous Action under Prison Litigation Reform Act 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) is DENIED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Doug Waddington are DISMISSED and Defendant Doug Waddington is DISMISSED as a Defendant. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 53 Motion To Strike signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: Plaintiff
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for continuance 54 is GRANTED in that Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 49 shall be due on or before 4/2/12. Defendants may file a reply on April 6, 2012. The Clerk shall re-note Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 49 for 4/6/12. Plaintiff's motion 54 is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 45 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER denying 36 Motion for Appointment of Orthopedic Medical Expert signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 27 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Discovery completed by 11/7/2011, Dispositive motions due by 1/6/2012, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 24 Motion to modify service of process signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. If Defendants are in possession of the last known business or last known home address of Russell Amaru, they shall submit such address to the Court under seal on or before August 5, 2011. (MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DIRECTING SUBMISSION OF SERVICE ADDRESS FOR UNSERVED DEFENDANT signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. Plaintiff is directed to provide Court with a new address for Russell Amaru on or before May 27, 2011. (MET) cc: Plaintiff
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) Paper copy sent to plaintiff @ WCC address . Modified on 4/11/2011 (JL).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
