Employee Painters' Trust Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Seattle Structures, LLC et al
| International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 5, Painters and Allied Trades International Union and Industry Pension Fund, Western Washington Apprenticeship and Training Trust, Western Washington Painters Labor Management Cooperation Trust, Employee Painters' Trust Health & Welfare Fund and Western Washington Painters Defined Contribution Pension Trust |
| Jane Doe Harrison, David Bailey, Seattle Structures, LLC, Jane Doe Bailey and Jesse Harrison |
| 3:2011cv05265 |
| April 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Pierce |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 51 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration. As a result, Plaintiffs' Motion for SUMMARY JUDGMENT Against the Individual Defendants is also GRANTED. Plaintiffs are to file a proposed form of judgment. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 10/2/2012 (DN). (ccs to Jane Doe Harrison and Jane Doe Bailey)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 43 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 7/30/2012 (DN). (cc to defs Bailey and Harrison)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
