Williams v. Judge et al
| Maunu Renah Williams |
| D.A., Samuel Wardle, Cowlitz County Jail and Staff, Moses and Judge |
| 3:2011cv05571 |
| July 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Cowlitz |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Karen L Strombom |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER ADOPTING 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 64 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Maunu Renah Williams signed by Judge Benjamin H Settle. (MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER that Petitioner must pay the filing fee of $5.00 or submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis , including a certified copy of his prison trust account statement on or before 9/16/11. Mr. Williams must su bmit an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus on the appropriate form by 9/16/11. If Plaintiff seeks to file a separate 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, he should submit the complaint, on the Court's form, along with a properly completed ap plication to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's filings (ECF Nos. 4, 5 7, and 9-32) are DENIED without prejudice. **SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS** Until he has complied with this Order to Show Cause, Mr. Williams shall stop filing pleadings in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
