Cabela's Retail Inc v. Hawks Prairie Investment LLC
| Cabela's Retail Inc |
| Hawks Prairie Investment LLC |
| 3:2011cv05973 |
| November 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Pierce |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
349
REVISED ORDER re 348 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing
348
ORDER granting 324 Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 327 Defendant's Motion for Payment of Bond; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
315
ORDER granting 281 Hawks Prairie's Motion for Attorney Fees; the Clerk will enter a second supplemental judgment reflecting this award. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
300
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 277 Motion for Judgment, granted to the extent of interest on the $5 million repayment, denied as to prejudgment interest on the value of the land. ORDER granting 279 Motion to Stay for an additional (10) ten days. ORDER denying 282 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER granting 161 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration ; granting in part and denying in part 165 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 171 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
196
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 184 Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER DENYING 104 Hawks Prairie's Motion for Summary Judgment; STRIKING 131 Hawks Prairie's Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice as premature; Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER granting in part 104 Hawks Prairie's Motion for Summary Judgment; the Pantier Declaration 106 is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER directing Cabela's to promptly produce the documents submitted for in camera review to Hawks Prairie and that the pending motions to quash ( 83 and 85 ) are STRICKEN, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (GMR)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 58 Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Cabela's Wholesale, Inc. as Plaintiff, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 28 Hawks Prairie' Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cabela's Retail Inc v. Hawks Prairie Investment LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cabela's Retail Inc | |
| Represented By: | David C Neu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hawks Prairie Investment LLC | |
| Represented By: | Arnold Michael Willig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
