Kelly v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
| Roberta Kelly |
| David Weibel, JPMorgan Chase & Co, USBancorp US Bank, Lee Mitau, General Mortgage GMAC, Merscorp, MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, John V Acosta, Ann Aiken, Matthew Cleverley, C Marie Eckert, Teresa H Pearson and Jeanne Kallage Sinnott |
| 3:2012cv05088 |
| February 1, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Cowlitz |
| Robert J. Bryan |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S VARIOUS MOTIONS AND DISMISSING CASE, denying 25 Motion for Accomodation ; striking 27 Motion ; granting 30 Motion to Dismiss; striking 33 Motion for Protective Order; striking 35 Motion to Dismiss; denying 38 Motion for Oral Argument ; denying 39 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, denying 22 Motion to Amend. On or before March 27, 2012, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any she has, why her Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim and for improper venue. All other motions are renoted to 3/30/12. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan.(JL) Paper copy sent to plaintiff @ Castle Rock address . Modified on 3/20/2012 (JL).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
