Combs v. Washington State et al
| Robin Blake Combs, Sr |
| Washington State, Washington Department of Corrections, Jeffrey A Uttecht, David Bailey, Melissa Andrewjeski, Bryan King, Joshua C Brown, Eric Askren, Elizabeth G Suiter and Dale Fetroe |
| 3:2012cv05280 |
| March 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| Karen L Strombom |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 146 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Robin Blake Combs, Sr; 145 GRANTING Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiff Combs' federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, and his state law claiims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 8/29/2014 (DN). (cc to pltf)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER granting 118 Motion for Extension of Time; Dispositive motions due by 10/4/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER denying 110 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 5/23/2013 (DN). (cc to pltf)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting in part 105 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration on compelling documents; denying 106 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration on Appointment of Counsel; denying 107 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration on Appointment of Expert Witnesses. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 5/21/2013 (DN). (cc to pltf)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 89 Motion to Compel signed by Judge Karen L Strombom. Plaintiffs motion to compel (ECF No. 89) is DENIED, except as to the opiate protocols (RFP No. 12 (5th Request)) which shall be deferred. Defendants shall produce the opiate protocols to the Court under seal for in camera inspection within ten (10) days of this Order.(MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 87 Motion to Appoint Expert Witness signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER Directing Submission of Addresses Under Seal on or before 11/30/2012, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (GMR- cc: pltf)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 19 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Judge Karen L Strombom. Discovery to be completed by 2/22/2013, Dispositive motions due by 4/26/2013 and Joint Status Report due by 7/26/2013. Defendants to submit addresses to the Court under seal on or before November 13, 2012. (MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class; mailed on 10/18/12 to all unserved defendants; General Order sent to Pltf., signed by Judge Karen L Strombom. (MET) cc: plaintiff w/general order, courtesy copy to AG
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. The Courts Order (ECF No. 17) is RESCINDED. No amounts should be deducted from Plaintiffs prisoner account for this payment of filing fees for this case. If any amounts have been deducted, they should be returned to Plaintiff.(MET) cc: plaintiff, IFP Account Manager, MCC & Seattle Financial
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 8 Motion for Order of Service Addresses signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: Plaintiff w/IFP Application
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
