Thovson v. Behavioral Health Resources
Plaintiff: April Thovson
Defendant: Behavioral Health Resources
Case Number: 3:2012cv05424
Filed: May 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Lewis
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 9 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thovson v. Behavioral Health Resources
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Thovson
Represented By: Larry James King
Represented By: Frederick Henry Gautschi, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Behavioral Health Resources
Represented By: Bryan Patrick O'Connor
Represented By: Sieu K. Che
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?