Johnson v. Gildehaus et al
Donald Isaac Johnson |
Kenneth Henson, State of Washington, Pierce County, City of Lakewood, Lakewood Police Department, City of Tacoma, Pierce County Jail, Pierce County Superior Courts, Andrew Gildehaus, Bryce Nelson, Department of Assigned Counsel and Mark Lindquist |
3:2012cv05818 |
September 12, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
Pierce |
Ronald B. Leighton |
Karen L Strombom |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 DISMISSING this matter Without Prejudice, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 12/28/2012 (DN). (cc to pltf) |
Filing 7 ORDER to AMEND Complaint or SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be dismissed. Amended Complaint or Show Cause Response due by 10/26/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff w/enclosures) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO AMEND OR SHOW CAUSE re 5 Complaint, filed by Donald Isaac Johnson. Amended Complaint or Show Cause Response due by 10/26/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff w/enclosures) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND FORWARD PAYMENTS, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.