Francis v. Hammond et al
Shawn Francis |
Steven Hammond, Sara Smith, J David Kenney, Bernard Warner, Brandon Wells, Martha Hayes and Washington Department of Corrections |
3:2012cv06023 |
December 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
Thurston |
J Richard Creatura |
Ronald B. Leighton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 73 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Shawn Francis; denying plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, granting defendants' motion for summary judgment; dismissing all claims with prejudice; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) |
Filing 67 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 50 MOTION for Order Regarding Attorney-Client Communication, signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(GMR) |
Filing 42 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 37 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint Without Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(GMR) Modified on 1/8/2014 to correct a typo only (GMR). |
Filing 32 ORDER denying 29 Defendants' Motion to Stay, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) |
Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 Objections to Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief is granted in part, as more fully set forth in this Order, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.