Dennis v. The Hershey Company et al
Al Dennis |
Gregory John Pell, Michael R West, Benjamin J Stoffel, Thomas C Smuda and The Hershey Company |
3:2013cv05131 |
February 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
Pierce |
Ronald B. Leighton |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 50 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute and Motion for Summary Judgment filed by The Hershey Company; Show Cause Response due by 10/28/2014; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) |
Filing 44 ORDER granting 38 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Dennis' claims for racial discrimination, retaliation, and disparate treatment are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) |
Filing 35 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's IIED claim is GRANTED; Motion to dismiss Plaiintiff's constructive discharge and hostile work environment claims is DENIED; the request for fees is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting 9 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claims for lack of personal jurisdiction with respect to Plaintiff's WLAD claims; plaintiff has 20 days to amend his complaint with respect to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.