Graham v. Colvin
Plaintiff:
William Lee Graham
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number:
3:2013cv05300
Filed:
April 19, 2013
Court:
Washington Western District Court
Office:
Tacoma Office
County:
Pierce
Presiding Judge:
Karen L Strombom
Nature of Suit:
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action:
42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| March 31, 2014 | 17 |
ORDER Affirming Defendant's Decision to Deny Benefits by Judge Karen L Strombom. (TW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Graham v. Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Lee Graham | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Schwab |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin | |
| Represented By: | Kerry Jane Keefe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.