Payment v. Siegler et al
Kyle Lee Payment |
Randy Simonsen, Steven Weed, Ryan Siegler, Jerry McHaffie, Bernie Warner, Mike Obenland, Steve Blakeman and Brenda McKinney |
3:2013cv05496 |
June 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
Clallam |
J Richard Creatura |
Ronald B. Leighton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 50 the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendants Siegler, McHaffie, McKinney, Warner, Obenland, and Blakemen are dismissed with prejudice; Defendants Weed and Simonsen still remain in the case. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 7/21/2014 (DN). (cc to pltf) |
Filing 45 ORDER granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time; Plaintiff will have until March 28, 2014, to file his response to defendants' 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Court re-notes defendants' 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment for consideration on April 11, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Filing 19 ORDER denying 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class Mail; mailed on 6/25/13 to Defendants; General Order sent to Pltf. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.