Hankerson v. Department of Risk Management et al
Plaintiff: Cullen M. Hankerson
Defendant: Department of Risk Management, Greg Pressel, Mary Ellen Combo, John Doe and Jane Doe
Case Number: 3:2013cv06036
Filed: December 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: XX US, Outside District
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H Settle
Presiding Judge: Karen L Strombom
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER that the Court DENIES Hankerson's 81 Motion for Relief because he fails to show fraud or any other reason that justifies relief. Furthermore, the Court again REVOKES Hankerson's in forma pauperis status for purposes of appeal of this order because any appeal would be frivolous. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff via USPS)
March 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle re 67 Report and Recommendations. 64 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, filed by Cullen M. Hankerson, 73 Motion for Extension of Time filed by Cullen M. Hankerson, 76 Motion to Continue filed by Cullen M. Hankerson, 68 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Cullen M. Hankerson, 70 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Cullen M. Hankerson are all terminated. (TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER denying as frivolous the 52 Motion to present new evidence and denying the 56 Motion for Leave to File amended complaint. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to defendants' 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment on or before 11/14/1 4. The undersigned will not entertain any other motion that delays consideration of this dispositive motion. The undersigned re-notes defendants' 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment for consideration on 11/21/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle overruling 49 Plaintiff's objections to Magistrate's Order. (TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle denying 46 Plaintiff's objections.(TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 30 Motion to Produce; denying Plaintiff's 31 Motion to strike; and denying Plaintiff's 32 Motion to Extend scheduling deadlines, but will give Mr. Hankerson until 9/5/14 to file a response to de fendants' motion for summary judgment. Defendants' reply must be filed on or before 9/12/14. Defendants' 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment is re-noted for 9/12/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
May 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying 16 Motion to Continue in light of the subsequent stipulation.Discovery is continued to 9/12/2014. Dispositive motions must be filed on or before 10/24/2014. The parties are advised that a due date for filing a Joint Pretrial Statement may be established at a later date pending the outcome of any dispositive motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hankerson v. Department of Risk Management et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cullen M. Hankerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Risk Management
Represented By: Sean-Michael V Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Pressel
Represented By: Sean-Michael V Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Ellen Combo
Represented By: Sean-Michael V Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Sean-Michael V Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Represented By: Sean-Michael V Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?