Port of Ridgefield v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Port of Ridgefield |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| Port of Ridgefield |
| 3:2014cv06024 |
| December 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Clark |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
ORDER denying 172 Port of Ridgefield's Motion for Reconsideration; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
170
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 93 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER granting 75 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 77 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 98 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER denying 36 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 40 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time, denying motion for stay, granting motion for leave to amend its counterclaims; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
