Contreras-Rebollar v. Key
Petitioner: Adrian Contreras-Rebollar
Respondent: U.S.
Case Number: 3:2015cv05471
Filed: July 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Pierce
Presiding Judge: J Richard Creatura
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H. Settle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Adrian Contreras-Rebollar, Prisoner ID: 819639)(TG)
August 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle re 56 Report and Recommendations. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Adrian Contreras-Rebollar, Prisoner ID: 819639)(TG)
June 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER ON REVIEW OF REFUSAL TO RECUSE re petitioner's 57 Motion for Recusal of Magistrate Judge Creatura signed by Chief Judge Ricardo S Martinez.**5 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Adrian Contreras-Rebollar, Prisoner ID: 819639)(RS)
June 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER DECLINING to Recuse Voluntarily, REFERRING the 57 Motion to Chief Judge Ricardo Martinez, and STAYING this action and all motions pending before the Court pending resolution of the recusal issue; signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. **4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Adrian Contreras-Rebollar, Prisoner ID: 819639)(GMR)
January 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle re 43 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Adrian Contreras-Rebollar. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Adrian Contreras-Rebollar, Prisoner ID: 819639)(TG)
October 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle re 38 Report and Recommendations. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Adrian Contreras-Rebollar, Prisoner ID: 819639)(TG)
August 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge J Richard Creatura denying 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (MET) cc: petitioner
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Judge J Richard Creatura directing service and substituting respondent. Certified mail sent on 8/17/15 to Respondent & AG. (MET) cc: petitioner w/pro se sheet.
July 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to file an amended petition by 8/28/15 signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. (MET) cc: petitioner with form
July 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Judge J Richard Creatura.(MET) cc: petitioner
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contreras-Rebollar v. Key
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Adrian Contreras-Rebollar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?