Osborne v. Clark County Sheriff's Office et al
Lucas Osborne |
Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County Jail, Mike Anderson, Addie, Wolf, Robert Lewis, Ashworth, Richard Bishop, Kim Beltran, Jason Poe, Joe Barnett, Randy Tangen and Paul Dougher |
3:2016cv05307 |
April 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
Clark |
David W. Christel |
Benjamin H. Settle |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER adopting 45 Report and Recommendations re 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC) |
Filing 41 ORDER by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel re Plaintiff's 38 Motion for Leave to File and Amend and Strike All Current Dates and Add New Trial and Discovery Dates. Plaintiff's Request to Amend his Complaint is Denied. Plaintiff's R equest for an extension to respond to Defendants 33 Summary Judgment Motion if leave to amend is denied, is Granted. Plaintiff shall have until October 24, 2017 to file a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' re ply to Plaintiff's response shall be filed on or before October 27, 2017. The Clerk is directed to re-note Defendants' 33 Motion for Summary Judgment for October 27, 2017. **5 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Lucas Osborne, Prisoner ID: 354466)(GMR) |
Filing 23 ORDER denying without prejudice the 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel.(CMG)cc to Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.