Stuhr v. Glebe
Petitioner: Clark Lee Stuhr
Respondent: Pat Glebe
Case Number: 3:2016cv05833
Filed: September 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Mason
Presiding Judge: David W. Christel
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H. Settle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle re 28 Motion for Extension of Time filed by Clark Lee Stuhr, 29 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Clark Lee Stuhr. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Clark Stuhr, Prisoner ID: 947192)(TG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stuhr v. Glebe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Clark Lee Stuhr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pat Glebe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?