Ploium v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Ralph D. Ploium
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2016cv05881
Filed: October 17, 2016
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Brian A Tsuchida
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:206
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 20, 2017 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED 25 MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FRCP 60(b), AND AWARDING ADDITIONAL EAJA FEES by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida.(AE)
July 10, 2017 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (AE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ploium v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Kerry Jane Keefe(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ralph D. Ploium
Represented By: Eitan Kassel Yanich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?