Bent v Lashway, et al
Michael S Bent |
Patricia Lashway, Mark Greenberg, Mark McCauley and Greg Kimsey |
3:2016cv05916 |
October 31, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
Clark |
Benjamin H. Settle |
Other Civil Rights |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 ORDER signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle denying 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 68 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 76 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants and close the case. (TG) |
Filing 70 ORDER signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for pretrial conference. FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 9/22/2017, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/29/2017, Joint Status Report due by 10/6/2017.(TG) |
Filing 54 ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle denying as moot 45 Motion to Dismiss; denying 46 Motion to Dismiss; Amanda Barlow (in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families) terminated. (TG) |
Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING 24 Motion for More Definite Statement & 25 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has until 3/3/2017 to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying 16 Motion for TRO by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(TG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.