The Estate of Jolene Lovelett v. United States of America et al
| The Estate of Jolene Lovelett |
| United States of America, State of Washington, The Confederated Tribes of The Chehalis Reservation, Abbott Adult Family Homes LLC, Florence Fadele, ARNP, Kristy Danforth, RN, Trisha Shipp, LPN, Heather Hoyle, Nancy Dufraine, Kelsie Moen, RN, Sandra Sanders, Renna Rizal, Bhakta Rizal and Does I-XX |
| 3:2016cv05922 |
| November 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Thurston |
| Benjamin H. Settle |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting 172 Motion to Dismiss.(TG)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle Requesting Response from United States Government by 6/26/2018. Any other party may respond by 6/29/2018. Dispositive motion deadline is extended to 7/13/2018, and all pending motions are renoted to 6/29/2018. (TG)
|
|
Filing
162
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting in part 93 Joint MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Nancy Dufraine, et al., and requesting response by 6/15/2018. Dispositive motions due by 6/28/2018. (TG)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER denying 67 Motion to Dismiss; denying 68 Motion to Compel signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(TG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
