Edenstrom v. Thurston County et al
| Theodore Bruce Edenstrom |
| Thurston County, Seth J Schade and Mike Kain |
| 3:2016cv05982 |
| November 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Thurston |
| Karen L Strombom |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER ON (1) PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT SETH SCHADE'S RESPONSES TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND (2) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (cc: Defendant Schade at Olympia address) (TC)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER On Review of Refusal to Recuse re Plaintiff's 58 Motion/Affidavit of Prejudice. The Court finds no evidence upon which to reasonably question Judge Bryan's impartiality and AFFIRMS his denial of Plaintiff's request that he recuse himself. Signed by Chief Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(TH) Modified on 9/6/2017 (TH). (cc: Defendant Seth Schade served via U.S. Mail)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS THURSTON COUNTY AND MIKE KAIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT AND (2) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff and Defendant Schade to respond to Order to Show Cause by 9/1/17. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) Paper copy sent to defendant Schade. at Olympia address . Modified on 8/22/2017 (JL).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
