Johnson v. City of Olympia et al
| Tyrone Johnson |
| City of Olympia, City of Olympia Police Department, Ryan Donald, George Clark, Johnathan Hazen, Eric Henrichsen, Matthew Renscler, Randy Wilson and Does 7-12, ABC Corp, and XYZ Corp |
| 3:2017cv05403 |
| May 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Pierce |
| Robert J. Bryan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER re Defendants' 69 Motion in Limine. Motions in Limine A, B, C, D, E, J, M, R and S are not contested, and are GRANTED. Defendants' Motion in Limine F, G, H, I, K, L, N, O, P, Q are DENIED. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH) Modified on 10/12/2018 to edit docket text and indicate Motion in Limine M is granted (TH).
|
|
Filing
97
PARTIES' JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. Mr. Johnson's Fourth Amendment claims against Officers Donald, Clark, Hazen, and Henrichsen and Sergeant Renschler shall proceed to trial. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTE ORDER renoting Defendants' 47 MOTION for Summary Judgment to 7/20/2018, per 56 Stipulation. Plaintiff's opposition due 7/10/2018. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
46
PROTECTIVE ORDER re parties' 45 Stipulation, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 38 Motion to Compel Responses; denying the Motion for Attorney Fees, signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting Defendants' 39 Motion File an Overlength Brief in Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 38 . Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 30 MOTION for Extension of Time to Produce Expert Reports. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve expert reports within three (3) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Extension of Time to Produce Expert Reports. Should Plaintiff wish to file additional evidence in support of its Motion, it may do so within five (5) days. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER per the parties' request, Defendants' 26 Motion for Relief from a Deadline, 27 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and 28 Motion to Dismiss are stricken from docket. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER per 29 Stipulation, the Court ORDERS the Plaintiff's causes of action for assault, battery and unlawful imprisonment dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party, as to all defendants. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR TRIAL CONTINUANCE AND NEW DISCOVERY SCHEDULE: Jury Trial CONTINUED to 10/15/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 14206 before Judge Marsha J. Pechman; Discovery Motions due by 4/18/2018, Discovery completed by 5/18/2018, Disposit ive motions due by 6/18/2018, Motions in Limine due by 9/10/2018, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 10/3/2018, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 10/3/2018, Pretrial Conference set for 10/5/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge Marsha J. Pechman. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 20 Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena, signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
