Eckles v. Kingston et al
| Floydale Eckles, Sr |
| Peggy Kingston, Department of Corrections, Harrison Medical Center and Marlanea Aspden |
| 3:2017cv05492 |
| June 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Mason |
| David W. Christel |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 52 GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 39 , plaintiff's claims are DISMIMSSED with prejudice, and the case is CLOSED; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 2/6/2019 (DN). (cc to pltf)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 19 Dismissing Defendant Harrison Medical Center without prejudice; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 3/16/2018 (DN). (cc to pltf)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 16 Motion to Stay: Plaintiff's request for stay is denied; however, Plaintiff shall have up to and including 3/9/18 to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff's request for court-appointed counsel is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed 2nd Amended Complaint, # 2 Proposed Address List, # 3 Pro se Instruction Sheet)(CMG)(cc mailed to Plaintiff w/forms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
