West v. Stackley
Plaintiff: Joe Ann West
Defendant: Sean J Stackley
Case Number: 3:2017cv05510
Filed: July 5, 2017
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Kitsap
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 15 Plaintiff's Motion to Continue; granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Add Kelly Bishop Affidavit; denying 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Produce; granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Add West's Affidavit; this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: West v. Stackley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Ann West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sean J Stackley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?